The evidence to support medicalised gender transitions in adolescents is worryingly weak
The evidence supporting medicalised gender transitions in adolescents is weak and controversial, with concerns about the effectiveness and side-effects of treatments.

- The evidence supporting medicalised gender transitions in adolescents is weak and not well understood.
- The number of teenagers seeking treatment for gender dysphoria has risen significantly in recent years.
- Controversy surrounds the use of gender-affirming care, with different countries having misgivings about the treatment.
- Studies have shown that the academic evidence for puberty-blockers and cross-sex hormones is weak and contradictory.
- There is a lack of data on the number of individuals who detransition after undergoing medical interventions.
The evidence to support medicalised gender transitions in adolescents is worryingly weak
The effectiveness and side-effects of the most common treatments are not well understood | Briefing
